Talk:The Succession to Muhammad

Does anyone think this an article? It is not even a stub. --R. la Rue (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

talk with GorgeCustersSabre

GorgeCustersSabre. You say I give excessive attention to one point. which is that? In my version there are three points from that author which I think are balanced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.125.41.217 (talk) 18:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC) @GorgeCustersSabre:

Dear friend 5.125.41.217, I do not believe your addition maintains a neutral point of view and I think it simply adds too much unnecessary information. I am open to being wrong on both views so perhaps we can wait until a third editor takes a stance. Hope this is fine. All good wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 12:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Review of the Middle East Librarians Association

Thanks for expanding the article, @AhmadLX. However, one of the cited reviews is not written by an expert. They are described as an "associate librarian" working at the University of Utah.[1] The lack of expertise makes it unreliable and it should not be cited next to experts. Wiqi⁽⁵⁵⁾ 04:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

@Wiqi55: Admittedly, the journal name did make me pause for a while but from "University of Utah" I assumed she was a professor or something, and didn't bother to check further. She does have a Masters degree in Arabic according to the LinkedIn profile at least, but no higher qualification. Thanks for bringing this up. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 18:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)