Talk:The Kashmir Files
Latest comment: 2 months ago by 2409:4080:D86:E154:937:2522:C86D:F399 in topic This article is biased and needs editing.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Kashmir Files article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
Many of these questions arise frequently on the talk page concerning The Kashmir Files.
Q1: Why does this article state exodus and not genocide?
A1: Wikipedia relies on reliable sources that have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The Neutral point of view policy, especially the sections Undue weight and Equal validity, requires that editors not add their own editorial biases when writing text based on such sources. As the relevant academic field generally rejects the several hypotheses grouped under the umbrella of Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus as a genocide, it would be a disservice to our readers to have a description of the topic that does not reflect the consensus view. Further advice for how to treat topics such as this one may be found at the Fringe theories and Reliable sources guidelines. The reliable sources consider the description of the violence as a "genocide" or "ethnic cleansing" to be widely inaccurate, aggressive, or propaganda. |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Kashmir Files. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Kashmir Files at the Reference desk. |
 | The Kashmir Files was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 27, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
| Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source: |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
This article is biased and needs editing.
editThis is a biased article and doesn’t not even have the name of scholars who find it fictional. Shame. Shinychaudhary (talk) 09:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- The article has lots of reliable sources for finding the film fictional. Have you looked at the footnotes? Bishonen | tålk 09:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC).
- how a journalist feels about a film shouldn't be included. Some people feel positive some negative. Personal feelings should be kept out it Akt 2000 (talk) 06:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely right. And why can't we edit the page for correctness? Hie can a historical fact, based on numerous eye witnesses and records be termed as fictional? 2409:4080:D86:E154:937:2522:C86D:F399 (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Sequel / Extension - The Kashmir Files: Unreported
editI think we should add information about the docu-series The Kashmir Files: Unreported, which is being seen as a sequel to the movie. the series contains interviews that were conducted as a part of the research for the film.
Why is this page locked for editing.
editWhy is the page locked ? 103.95.173.75 (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Because people kept trying to claim that it was a documentary, or a true story. Black Kite (talk) 13:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 September 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Pls put up correct facts on Wikipedia. Thought the movie was a bit extreme. But it have shown truth. If not, how come the Kashmir which was once have a huge population of Kashmiri pandit , are now left in rarity. And to Wikipedia . I am a donor and pls don’t put wrong facts for your secularism and tell that the persecution of Kashmiri pandit was not done . Be factual as people trust woke Pedia and it’s not a movie made for entertainment 103.171.132.46 (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. BelowTheSun (T•C) 19:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
