Talk:The Daily Mash/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Hunter Kahn in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
A good article is:

  1. Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects, no unneeded detail.
  4. Neutral: Yes.
  5. Stable: Yes.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images: As well as can be expected.

I was going to come in here and complain about the length, but length is not a GA criteria requirement; covering the major aspects of a topic is, and frankly, after looking around a bit at other sources, this article seems to cover them. Nice little article, I hope it continues to grow. --Hunter Kahn (talk) 05:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply