| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Daily Mash article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The Daily Mash has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring themes
editThoughts on a section/sentence outlining recurring use of names such as Tom Logan, Donnelly-McPartlin, Madeley Finnegan etc.? --82.35.199.221 (talk) 22:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
GA
editGood to see that this made GA status so quickly. Makes a change from stupid admins deleting the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.167.122 (talk) 12:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Ad Copy
editReads like a pitch to potential advertisers: too many references to who its readers are - City workers and university graduates all earning loads of money, apparently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.225.46 (talk) 11:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- One reference, taken from coverage by a reliable source. bridies (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- One completely irrelevant reference taken from one source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.217.18 (talk) 09:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- Right, how can an article focussing on the subject be "irrelevant"? Claims don't require multiple sources. bridies (talk) 12:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- One completely irrelevant reference taken from one source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.217.18 (talk) 09:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Paywall
editDon't know whether this needs a new section, or how best to reference it, but the website now charges you to read more than 7 articles in a 30-day period... NJHartley (talk) 13:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Daily Mash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090703075338/http://www.thefreesociety.org:80/Columnists/Neil-Rafferty/new-labour-and-the-bully-state to http://www.thefreesociety.org/Columnists/Neil-Rafferty/new-labour-and-the-bully-state
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
"left wing"
editDescribing The Daily Mash as 'left wing' is inaccurate. 51.9.205.54 (talk) 10:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)