Talk:Taxpayer March on Washington
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taxpayer March on Washington article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 14 days ![]() |
![]() | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Taxpayer March on Washington. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Taxpayer March on Washington at the Reference desk. |
![]() | A fact from Taxpayer March on Washington appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Signage section
editThe current version makes it sound like the signs had nothing but crazy/conspiracy related messages. I was at the event and can assure that the strong majority of signs were on sound policy ground, and pictures of the event verify that. I have added the POV-section template. BS24 (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Made an attempt to give representation to rational protest signs in addition to the more obtuse ones. DarkTyph (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Taxpayer March on Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090922172005/http://washingtonindependent.com/59109/beltway-conservatives-comb-tea-party-movement-for-converts to http://washingtonindependent.com/59109/beltway-conservatives-comb-tea-party-movement-for-converts
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711163437/http://www.heralddemocrat.com/hd/News/2009_09-15_news_Taxpayer-March-on-Washington to http://www.heralddemocrat.com/hd/News/2009_09-15_news_Taxpayer-March-on-Washington
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)