Talk:Sukyo Mahikari

Additional Sources

I recently read Religion and Cyberspace and Japanese New Religions, which are sources currently cited on this page, and will be making some edits based upon these books. For any questions about this content, please comment here. Orlivia (talk) 01:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia Added one sentence on natural farming from Japanese New Religions book.Orlivia (talk) 02:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia Added more content from previously cited sourceOrlivia (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia

not neutral opinion

The article about mahikari is far from being neutral. It mixes and distorts some of their concepts with some ones pesonal interpretation regarding the topic. It´s not about agreeing or desagreeing with the contend, but pointing out the way it´s presented.

words like: a lot, many... show how are we adding to the facts our personal opinion. And this should not be happening in a wikipedia page.

Being neutral is really a challeging task. When we tell or write a fact, we tend also to include some of own values and personal views, but the purpose of wikipedia, as far, as I understand it, is to inform, leaving aside personal opinion. Religions are in fact very delicate topics. But being neutral should be the goal and if a page is incapable of it, whould be removed or re-written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exs sky (talk • contribs) 18:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

edits 21st january

Best to gather that information based on reliable sources and insert section on criticism. Per definition it is a new religion. Based on that definition there are a few orgs that are considered cults but the term cult is conflict burden on Wikipedia.--Catflap08 (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Edit again because you are wrong!

Mahikari is a real cult and listed here https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Governmental_lists_of_cults_and_sects So you are wrong! N1gh7r4v3n (talk) 21:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Again with all due respect please rad the guidelines an get familiar with Wikipedia. If not I will have to report you for vandalism. --Catflap08 (talk) 21:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sukyo Mahikari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110317123408/http://www.forbes.com:80/feeds/prnewswire/2010/04/29/prnewswire201004291100PR_NEWS_USPR_____LA95866.html to http://www.forbes.com/feeds/prnewswire/2010/04/29/prnewswire201004291100PR_NEWS_USPR_____LA95866.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)