Talk:Simcha Eichenstein
This article was nominated for deletion on August 22, 2018. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion of references
editStlippe, who heretofore has only edited this article (and one edit at Dov Hikind also in relation to this topic) has been systematically swapping references with no explanation [1], sometimes with imprecise ones [2]. One NY Daily News reference in particular has been removed multiple times with no replacement [3] [4] even though it backs up a statement in the article connecting the subject with Hikind. Since it is one of only a handful of mainstream sources confirming the existence of the poorly-sourced subject of this article, I believe it should be reinstated. StonyBrook (talk) 00:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- I added a same-newspaper/same-writer/same-year citation that should not attract the same level of dislike. For whatever it's worth, an attempt to find a followup (hearings, disposition, etc) to the focus of the story covered in the deleted citation re an article that doesn't
even have the man's first name, whereas other articles on the charge at least have Jakob (!) or Jacob. This is not to justify the above deletion(s), just to do a better job at refering to the previous and current office-holders in a mainstream newspaper. Pi314m (talk) 02:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)