Talk:Shimane Prefecture

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Do not delete "Takeshima"

edit

Do not delete "Takeshima" by the explanation. It is OK because the South Korean opinion is also indicated to one clue like the page of "Ulleung County" , don't you?
At the "See also", I can understand that the change of "Liancourt Rocks" to "dokdo".--Dent2000q 05:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I agree.--Junmai 05:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

we cannot flatly state that dokdo is a part of shimane prefecture when shimane doesn't have ownership, possession, or even access to it, that's just a false statement. dokdo is claimed to be a part of shimane prefecture, so the article should state so. you can delete a mention of dokdo altogether, but not insert a false statement. Appleby 06:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also, please keep in mind that deliberately replacing the name with a double-redirect one is not a good thing! Thank you, and have a nice day. Deiaemeth 06:27, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

It is an insistence of the South Korean point of view. And Ulleung- county's page is written as "including Dokdo" by the South Korean point of view. NPOV in this problem is to use a same expression both Ulleung-county and Shimane-prefecture. "including" or "not including" both pages. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Celldea (talkcontribs) 10 June 2006.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shimane Prefecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply