Talk:Shasta Dam

Untitled

The device on the upstream side is a device used to control what depth (and subsequently what temperature) water is released from in order to aid the ailing Sacramento River salmon run. 76.252.253.181 (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

It is really an arch dam ?

The mere fact of being curved in the plan view, does not make it an "arch dam". To be an arch dam, there has to be a structural arch resisting the pressure of the impounded water by transfering the stress to the abutments of the dam. The minimal curvature and massive cross-sectional profile of the wall shown in the construction view, leads to the conclusion that this is not actually an arch dam.Eregli bob (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

According to its DWR listing, Shasta is a gravity dam. I'll correct the article.—Stepheng3 (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Written like and editorial

This section reads like an editorial. A good encyclopedia article should be unbiased, this passage clearly is not.

"One of the most important points made by dam expansion opponents is that raising the dam will not create more water (in fact it will actually cause some water loss due to evaporation) but merely increases the capacity to store it. As a result, the reservoir will rarely be filled, as no matter how much Reclamation expands the dam, the river's flow will not increase." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stannie1950 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Shasta Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005023222/http://www.water.ca.gov/damsafety/docs/Federal2010.pdf to http://www.water.ca.gov/damsafety/docs/Federal2010.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101028121450/http://www.redding.com/news/2007/feb/19/flood-concerns/ to http://www.redding.com/news/2007/feb/19/flood-concerns/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613113325/http://dams.org/docs/kbase/studies/csusmain.pdf to http://www.dams.org/docs/kbase/studies/csusmain.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614231052/http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Powerplant.jsp?fac_Name=Shasta%20Powerplant to http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Powerplant.jsp?fac_Name=Shasta%20Powerplant
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6JFPDAcPt?url=http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Project.jsp?proj_Name=Shasta%2FTrinity%20River%20Division%20Project to http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Project.jsp?proj_Name=Shasta%2FTrinity%20River%20Division%20Project
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726020633/http://www.ejcw.org/our_work/shastadamraise.htm to http://www.ejcw.org/our_work/shastadamraise.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312052401/http://www.redding.com/news/2008/oct/25/shasta-dams-place-in-water-plans-uncertain/ to http://www.redding.com/news/2008/oct/25/shasta-dams-place-in-water-plans-uncertain/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121003060702/http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/PAP/PAP-0845.pdf to http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/PAP/PAP-0845.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110117053159/http://www.nativelegalupdate.com/2008/11/articles/water-law/winnemen-wintu-fear-losing-their-heritage-if-shasta-dam-raised/ to http://www.nativelegalupdate.com/2008/11/articles/water-law/winnemen-wintu-fear-losing-their-heritage-if-shasta-dam-raised/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100720084815/http://www.usbr.gov/mp/ncao/shasta/tour.html to http://www.usbr.gov/mp/ncao/shasta/tour.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222093259/http://www.usbr.gov/history/HistoryofLargeDams/LargeFederalDams.pdf to http://www.usbr.gov/history/HistoryofLargeDams/LargeFederalDams.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110312032652/http://www.sacredland.org/shasta-dams-full-history-must-be-told/ to http://www.sacredland.org/shasta-dams-full-history-must-be-told/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Unnecessary statement

The following at the end of the 'Completion' section is unnecessary:

"Ironically, the invention of photovoltaics in the 1950s disproved Crowe's claim, as the Shasta Dam continues to produce as much electricity as ever." Plenarium (talk) 17:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

That statement was unsourced, so I removed it. Indyguy (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Plenarium (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)