Talk:Shah Nimatullah Wali
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asalam Alaykum
editDear reader, thank you for taking the time to create a wiki article for such a great sufi philosopher. I am a descendant of him and like to thank you from the bottom of my heart. This brought a smile to my face as well as my family members. Peace be with you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.113.143 (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion below. - GTBacchus(talk) 16:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Shāh Ni'matullāh-i Walī → Shah Nimatullah per WP:COMMONNAME
- "Shāh Ni'matullāh-i Walī" -Llc (all languages) - 0
- "Shah Nimatullah-i Wali" -Llc 1, in German book.
- "Shah Nimatullah Wali" -Llc 25
- "Shah Nimatullah Vali" -Llc 4
- "Shah Nimatullah" -Llc 72
-- Takabeg (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose, or move to "Shah Nimatullah Wali". Shāh is a title, not part of the name, and Ni'matullāh is a single ambiguous name. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Takabeg, would you be happy with Shah Nimatullah Wali? -GTBacchus(talk) 01:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Shah Nimatullah Wali is acceptable (17 results). I'm always happy when we can anglicize the titles and contents of articles. -- Takabeg (talk) 02:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- P.S. "Shah Ni'matullah Wali" (Shah Ni'matullah Wali) seems more common in English books. Takabeg (talk) 02:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Split Article Material for Khalilullah
editA substantial amount of this article constitutes a sub-biography for Shah Khalilullah, Ni'matullah's son and spiritual successor. Additionally this entry contains a confusing description of Khalilullah's shrine.
There's a good deal of constructive work that may be done for overall improvement of this entry, and separating the material for Khalilullah into a separate historical biography is likely an easy starting point, if not fully sufficient or satisfying. Nick Ponder (talk) 00:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)