Talk:Segregation academy

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GreaterPonce665 in topic Ludicrous

Red-lined articles

edit

Fifteen referenced articles don't exist. I spent no time following the deletion discussions over the last couple of years, but some of these institutions are still extant and likely notable. To the extent that someone worked on them in the past, it might be worthwhile to see whether there was previously text, what it looked like, and whether the references are sufficient to support them. Conversely, some of these schools appear to have insufficient citations to be on the list. @GreaterPonce665: @Jacona: Rhadow (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

There's no significant deletion of school pages as far as I see. Just clicking through the redlinks, I found that only one of them was previously an article; all others are likely based on WP:REDYES. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 15:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ludicrous

edit

While one may not be sympathetic to these schools, this kind of ludicrously biased, poorly written “entry” is perfectly illustrative of why Wikipedia is not taken seriously. 2600:1700:A710:A3B0:C58:5706:E48A:8230 (talk) 23:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Could you be more specific as to what part of this article is "biased"? Thanks. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 00:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply