Evolutionary history

edit

The article says little is understood about their evolutionary history, but somehow places the origin of the group in the Devonian, when its sister group the Thecostomata only have a record back to the Paleogene. I'm fairly certain this is an error and will match it with Sea Butterflies. Those who find issue with this reasoning can change it as they may.2600:8800:1E00:25BC:504A:CECF:D5D4:5315 (talk) 06:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A note

edit

this is a very beautiful and rare fish in many parts of the world, i just wish so bad that i can see something like this one day in person, Flaka

Sources missing

edit

There are no sources cited in this article. Could someone please add some?

Glen Waverley Secondary College

edit

Has this college published its findings in a peer-reviewed scientific journal ? If so, then give the necessary references. Otherwise the guidelines of WP:Notability applies. JoJan 14:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Yes it has, although the IPCC as per the arrangement set out with Glen Waverley Secondary Collage was to remain quiet about the schools involvement until such a time as they deemed it newsworthy.--Loisburger 09:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Angelfish?

edit

Um, I have never heard sea angels referred to as "angelfish". "Angelfish" refers to freshwater angelfish or marine angelfish, not sea angels. Wouldn't that be kind of confusing to the average reader? Although, I HAVE heard of sea angels referred to as "cliones". ForestAngel (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Exclusively saltwater??

edit

The article makes no mention of ocean/marine, saltwater, freshwater, or brackish, so I am curious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.129.151.101 (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

Propose merge with Clionidae. Much duplicate information on what, as far as i can tell, is the same group of fauna. If i am taxonomically confused, remove tag Jebus989 (talk) 13:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I will remove the tag and try to make this clearer in the intros. There are in fact two superfamilies within the clade Gymnosomata, containing 6 families. All of these are known as sea angels. Like many common names, sea angel is not at all a precise term. Invertzoo (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


edit

I read on the sea angel page that there are a few pokemon with similar appearance, a few monsters in a videogame look like them and a 4chan kid draws snails. There is also a broken link showing it.

Wouldn't it be more decent to not have such useless crap on a scientific page?

Dvarrazzo (talk) 15:42, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sea angel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wonderful video: under the ice Sea Angel

edit

This video is awesome. link Wonder if it might be possible to find a creative commons licensed source for it, so it might be potential used on Wikipedia? ...given it was already shared freely on the internet. N2e (talk) 14:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply