 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 21 September 2013. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
 | The contents of the Sandinismo page were merged into Sandinista ideology on 22 October 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This whole thing is a love poem to the FSLN, its ridiculous —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpineda84 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge
editThis article should be merged with Sandinismo, because they are about the same ideology. Charles Essie (talk) 20:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I would tend to agree. There is a limit to how much we can subdivide articles based on subtle differences in topic. At this point, though, both articles need a lot of work, primarily adding references and removing OR.Vanamonde93 (talk) 08:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
I agree-- Sandinismo and Sandinista ideology are the same thing. Also, the entry on sandinismo is really terrible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.252.157.149 (talk) 21:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Agree - much of Sandismo was a fork/copy, with a few years of editing causing minor divergence. Klbrain (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Done
GOCEreviewed
editI have removed the {{copy edit}} tag from the article and placed {{GOCEreviewed}} above because of the above proposal to merge it. After the merge, or if the merge proposal is rejected, GOCE would be happy to provide a copy edit. --Stfg (talk) 14:02, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Edits made - 3/2/2015
editI have added a lead section to this article. The lead could be helpful if/when the article merger occurs.