A fact from Sabr appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 826 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/May. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Pronunciation?
editCould someone please add an appropriate IPA to the article? Thanks. --BorgQueen (talk) 12:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Ambiguity
editIn the "Classification" section, there is an ambiguous phrase from which the reader can come to two very different conclusions.
- He also gives an application of the concept, Muṣābara, in which ones refrains from taking revenge from one's fellow-creature (like neighbors, People of the Book).
Does this mean that it is more virtuous to refrain from taking revenge on one's enemy? Or does it mean that it is more virtuous to refrain from preventing one's neighbor to his vengeance?
Considering Hammurabi's Code an 'eye for an eye', I don't think my confusion should be completely unexpected.
BTW, I think "Sabr" sounds like an admirable concept, perhaps something we should all toward. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.172.82 (talk) 15:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC)