This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Ron Kind is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a HELL of a lot of controversy in and around the Kind & Nelson campaigns. How is it possible that none of that appears on either of their entries? -- Frankie
That's easy: you haven't made the case that the mud Nelson was slinging at Kind was encyclopedia-worthy. If you can't make that case yourself, who were you hoping would do it for you? The comments responding to his Youtube attack on Kind, which comes across as though it's targeted to those with an IQ below 80, are pretty accurately summarized by the 36-th most recent one, "It's nice to see that these disingenuous smear ads didn't fool the voting public. Shame on you Paul Nelson. Shame." They seem to have fooled you though. --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 04:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
User:Rushadthomas has introduced a large section into this article which is copied from Ron Kind's website at the House of Representatives here and pasted into the article here. WP:CV states that the article should be either speedily deleted, or reverted back to a clean revision that does not include any copyrighted material. However, since the material comes from a federal government website it is possible that the material is in the public domain (as work of the United States Government). If the copied material is not public domain the article needs to be reverted to this revision.--Oden07:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What exactly is the controversy cited here? The pay for talk thing makes sense to include in a controversies section (though I'd argue if that's the only controversy it's better placed within Section 2.2 Tenure). Why exactly should not publicly demanding Rangel resign be a controversy? He didn't defend him by any means so...? Mpen320 (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
