Talk:Ripper (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page needs an overhaul which would include links to other wikipedia pages and a spoiler warning. Cmw4117 04:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have added wikify and cleanup tags. Lead section is needed, fan sites are not permitted and, as said, a general overhaul is needed. Hoverfish Talk 20:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikified, added infobox and categories but cleanup tag remains for the fan sites. Hoverfish Talk 20:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am the one who created this page and now the link to a page on our site Bruce's Angels, with a review and commentary on Ripper has been taken down. But our site is not "spam" as defined by Wiki --we do not advertise nor is our link "irrelevant." The page is a review and discussion of this movie, not merely a link to our web site. We have seen other similar links on Wiki. Why was ours taken down? This seems like discrimination to us. For a further discussion of why we think this action by Irish Guy is inappropriate, please see the Discussion portion of the Bruce Payne page.

Ariel23 05:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Ripper2958.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Ripper2958.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic