Talk:Proposed secession of Republika Srpska

Source needed

Does anyone have a quote that would verify this statement in the article: "The Serb and Croat political leadership agreed on a partition of BiH with the 1991 Karađorđevo agreement and the 1992 Graz agreement, resulting in the Croat forces turning against the Bosnian Army in the Croat–Bosniak War (1992–94).". This seems completely false. Neither Croatia nor Serbia would have made an official document on this matter which by itself would be incriminating. I seriously doubt that either mentioned agreement has any clause on dividing Bosnia. 89.164.226.51 (talk) 10:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Polls section

I don't understand how a 2013 census can source a 2007 poll. Miniapolis 00:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Federal Republic

Bosnia-Herzegovina is not a federal republic. RS and FBiH are administrative units and not states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.68.3 (talk) 22:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Weird comment. They are not called states like in a lot of Western style Federations. But for all considered purposes, they are federal entities. They have their own governments, with a vast array of unique institiutions, from police, to minor customs to postal. There is actually few shared institutions that binds them, they of course have a common military, and they still have a binding supreme court shared between them. But that, among a shared currency(not necessarily a sign of shared statehood even, but they do got a common central bank) and a shared foreign policy. But beyond that, these entities has at least on paper vast internal governance, with only a few top level institutions binding them together. One can of course call them "Administrative Units", but then so could we call US states mere administrative divisions by that unobtainable standard. Comparing them to the internal divisions of a unitary state, which is implied, whould be kind of a joke in Political Science terminology. Akiosi (talk) 17:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)