Talk:Pokémon Channel

Latest comment: 7 days ago by Pokelego999 in topic Feedback on article
Featured articlePokémon Channel is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 30, 2014.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 11, 2014Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
March 30, 2014Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
April 23, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
November 16, 2024Featured article reviewKept
Current status: Featured article

Where would I put this?

edit

In The Power of Us, Pokémon Channel is referenced via a news station of the same name. Where would I put that note on this page? There seem to be no fitting categories, and it doesn't quite need a section of its own. FerDeLancer (talk) 14:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Feedback on article

edit

Hi there - I jumped the gun a little and nominated an FAR, but was advised it may be better to seek feedback and action on improving the page here. Sorry about that! There's a few points that stand out that could significantly improve this article:

  • Firstly, in terms of research, the article features overuse of quote citations from the game to evidence plot and gameplay mechanics. Secondary coverage should be preferred, other than WP:PLOT which tends to be viewed as self-evidently sourced from the work itself. This approach is arguably WP:EXCESSIVE - over half the article's citations are for quotes as trivial as 'The End' just to evidence that the game ends! Without these, the article is not particularly broadly cited - not that this is any barrier to FA status.
  • Secondly, in terms of comprehensiveness, the article has no actual development information that may shine a light on who made the game, how they made it and what they thought of it. The section relies on pre-release promotional articles that are purely early impressions of the game. This leads to unclear statements - that the game is a "spiritual successor" to Hey You Pikachu! and that it was developed for the purpose of promoting the e-reader - are likely the case but this is assumed from how an IGN preview describes it rather than the developer. Investigation into WP:NONENG sources and the potential for Japanese development interviews could significantly improve this section.
  • Thirdly, this may be a matter of personal opinion about comprehensiveness, but for a game titled Pokemon Channel with gameplay oriented around the channels, the gameplay section is well-written but does not go into much detail about what each channel is and what it features. I understand the channels are a bit superficial, but a list or more detailed description rather than a sentence that says Other channels include X, Y, and Z may be more helpful for readers to know exactly what content is offered in the game's channels.

Welcome your thoughts. VRXCES (talk) 00:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Vrxces do you still need help with making these edits? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey, go for it if you are able to help! Unfortunately I didn't quite understand FAR processes when I provided this feedback, that went a bit haywire and I forgot about this article. I fired up the GameCube and plan on checking this out again! VRXCES (talk) 03:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Vrxces is everything you listed above still in need of being done? It's been a while since I partook in the discussion so I'm not sure exactly what has and hasn't been done already. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply