Talk:Pipe Lake–Lake Lucerne

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 03:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the natural canal between Pipe Lake and Lake Lucerne was once spanned by a log bridge? Source: https://voiceofthevalley.com/2019/08/20/1934-log-bridge-between-pipe-lake-lake-lucerne/

Clear photographic evidence

• • ALT1: ... that Pipe Lake and Lake Lucerne are connected by a natural canal? Source: See previous source
  • ALT2: ... that the naturally connected Pipe Lake and Lake Lucerne are the only hydrilla-infested lakes in the state of Washington? Source: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/getting-to-the-bottom-of-lakes/
  • Reviewed: N/A

Created by DirtyHarry991 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pipe Lake–Lake Lucerne; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• ATL2 seems the most interesting out the three by a long shot. Orchastrattor (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Reviewing... New enough, long enough, no copyvio issues, interesting hooks. Whispyhistory (talk) 08:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

... Hooks in article and followed by citations to references containing hook facts. QPQ not required. ALT2 is good. Whispyhistory (talk) 14:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)