Talk:Pete Wisdom

Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Squirrel Conspiracy in topic Image deletion nomination(s)

MAX

edit

Uh, hey guys? MAX Wisdom is not in an alternate universe. It's still 616, as evidenced by his various phone calls to Kitty Pryde and other Marvel characters.

Could whoever added the quote please attribute proper citation for it? (I'm not even sure it should be in the article proper; maybe Wikiquote: Warren Ellis might be a better place for it.) Fastbak77 06:53, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hungerford

edit

When I woke up this morning, I wanted to add the datum that his mother was killed in the Hungerford massacre (which she was; apparently Ben Raab hadn't realized this was a historical event and tried to portray the killer as having been superpowered). However, now that I'm more conscious, I'm wondering if that's genuinely relevant to the article. Thoughts? DS 12:58, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Where and when did the Ben Raab gaffe occur? Kelvingreen 10:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Either way, why does this particular piece of character backstory appear in the article? It's been referred to in Marvel comics several times. 89.168.28.45 21:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • It's using a significant real world event as a part of the character's history; I'd say it's worth including (regardless of whether or not Raab's gaffe gets a mention with it). It's certainly been listed in the Hungerford massacre article for quite some time, so a mention here seems appropriate. Anyone got issue number to cite, though? --Mrph (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mary Sue

edit

Should there be some mention of the speculation that Wisdom is a Mary Sue of Warren Ellis?

No, because speculation doesn't really belong in Wikipedia. Unless, if I recall correctly, you got a link to a professional comic book writer critiquing the work or maybe Ellis saying something to the same effect. Lots42 08:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Constantine

edit

Hasn't there been some quote, probably from Warren Ellis, that Pete Wisdom was created as an analog of John Constantine? -- AvatarMN 23:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Eh, sounds doubtful to me. After all, Ellis did mock Con-job in the Pryde and Wisdom limited series. Lots42 08:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ellis said he was based on John Thaw's character from The Sweeney, there used to be an interview with him about it on an old fan site but it seems to be gone now. EDIT: Found it on wayback Wisdom is apparently "The disgusting lovechild of THE SWEENEY's Jack Regan and James Bond (or maybe Harry Palmer)" [1] Furtled! (talk) 00:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wisdom's mom continuities badly written

edit

Okay, let's take this by list.

1) Wisdom's mom was detailed as having been shot by a madman in the Pryde and Wisdom limited series.

2) Why can't an alternate universe Peter call alternate universe Kitty Pryde? The existence of Kitty doesn't mean the MAX series takes place on Earth 616.

3) And last but most importantly, the -entire- article is all sorts of weird. The Fictional Character biography is broken up into multiple, redundant sections! I wouldn't even know where in the crying out loud to -begin-.

Lots42 08:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I don't have an account, but felt I needed to comment on this article. Firstly it is neccesary to mention that at no point whatsoever has the Wisdom MAX series ever been publicly labelled as out of continuity. And now that Paul Cornell has been given writing chores on Excalibur I should imagine that this will become even clearer so.

I also find the comment upon Kitty Pryde's age to be a little misleading. Ellis was arguably not the first or ewven second writer to wriute Kity in this age range on Excalibur. Lobdell did before him, And Alan Davis quite intentionally drew Kity as slightly older than her Uncanny X-Men appearances from the very start of Excalibur - based on the appearance of Cathryne Hepburn.

It should also be noted that Wisdom did indeed fake his death in X-Force. Alistaire Stuart knew about it, as he was in on the act, but it was never revealed to X-Force in any way shape or form, so to say that they were shocked is simply not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.10.88 (talk) 00:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Wisdom1.jpg

edit
 

Image:Wisdom1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

edit

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done - that controversy section needs sourcing or removing. Once it is addressed then bump it back up to B. (Emperor (talk) 21:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC))Reply

Picture

edit

I recommend a different picture, a close up with Pete showing off his 'hot-knives'. Lots42 (talk) 23:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed - the old one was the cover from Wisdom but it was deleted and probably contradicts recommendations for a comic character's infobox. The current one seems to be a good example of the trend to upload the very latest image (which we are trying to avoid) and doesn't seem very representative. So what we want is a full body shot from the front, preferably showing him using the hot knives. Now all we have to do is find it. (Emperor (talk) 04:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC))Reply

Notes

edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pete Wisdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image deletion nomination(s)

edit

One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).

You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.

You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 30. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.

Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply