This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago9 comments7 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I came across this article while searching articles needing cleaning and I'm not sure if he is notable. The article obviously has issues and a look through the history shows it. My searches found results at News, Highbeam and a few Newspapers Archive. Also a few results at Books (but nothing looks promising) and nothig at Thefreelibrary. It seems he may be notable but I wanted to know before editing the article (if found notable, I'm willing to improve it). SwisterTwistertalk18:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Robert McClenon: That's what I initially intended but considering the article is a mess and there was a possibility he was notable, I wanted comments rather than a possible AfD where they'll say speedy keep. SwisterTwistertalk18:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
That is more acceptable, thanks. I was willing to improve it but honestly it seemed like it was going to be too much work (as it is, I'm not a fan or expert of politics). SwisterTwistertalk05:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think this RfC is a little off the mark, because AfD is the usual place to determine notability; but for what it's worth, as an elected official he is clearly notable. Cwobeel did the right thing in cleaning out unsourced info. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:08, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.