Talk:Partition of Bengal (1905)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Partition of Bengal (1905) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 16, 2019. |
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Swadeshi
editThere should be some mention of the Swadeshi movement since it was triggered by the partition of Bengal. Miss Clio (talk) 17:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment
editthe partition of bengal was first decided in 1903 and after 1905 and return in1911 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.52.155.4 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 11 February 2012
This article is totally biased as the partion of Bengal was not for administrative purposes rather was testimony to the divide and rule policy of Britishers who thrived on wealth of India ....stating this division as merely administrative would be non judicious to real facts
Melka 2 (talk) 13:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Neutrality of article
editThere are many subjective and possibly biased statements, as well as some potentially based in original research, all throughout this article. Knewhelns (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
There seems to be some bias in this article. Statements lean towards support for the British. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.244.141.57 (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- "Neutrality" in Wikipedia means being neutral with respect to the reliable secondary sources. Therefore the 'bias' complaint does not apply here. Rjensen (talk) 16:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
"The boycott was led by the moderates but minor terrorist groups also sprouted under its cause." What constitutes a terrorist group is not clear? I hope it is not a reference to Indian freedom fighters who believed it is right to use violent means (if it is indeed the reference to them then the term is opinionated) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.151.6 (talk) 03:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Misleading map
editThe map is quite misleading. The East Bengal and the West Bengal did not look like the ones created by 1947 partition. Please see
Khulna and Jessore were in Western Bengal then. Malaiya (talk)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
_partition_map.jpg){kind=link}
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)