This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PCI Express article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the PCI Express Mini Card page were merged into PCI Express on February 3, 2009. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see Error: Invalid time. its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
On 2 March 2010, PCI Express was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
"full-size" -- 10W vs 25W
edithttps://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/PCI_Express#Power
the 1st bulleted item says x1 cards are limited to 10W.
the 3rd bulleted item says "full-size" x1 cards may make a grab for 25W.
but what is "full-size"? it is nowhere defined in this article. that is not an official term.
"PCI Express® Card Electromechanical Specification Revision 2.0" section "4.2. Power Consumption" explains the 10W limitation exists for HALF-LENGTH x1 cards; those which are less than 7 inches deep. the reason is for heat dissipation via simple convection.
snippet:
Notes:
1. A standard height x1 add-in card intended for desktop applications is limited in
length to a half-length add-in card and 10 W maximum power dissipation. A
standard height x1 add-in card intended for server I/O applications with 25 W
maximum power dissipation must be greater than or equal to 177.80 mm
(7.0 inches) in length, but must not exceed a full-length add-in card. See Table 6-1
for add-in card size definitions. The same server I/O add-in card must, at initial
power-up, not exceed 10 W of power dissipation, until configured as a high power
device, at which time it must not exceed 25 W of power dissipation. Refer to
Chapter 6 of the PCI Express Base Specification, Revision 1.1 for information on
the power configuration mechanism.
"PCI Express® Card Electromechanical Specification Revision 3.0" section "4.2. Power Consumption" maintains the ordinary half-length x1 card's 10W limit, but increases other cards' limits to 75W after configuration.
snippet:
• A x1 standard height, half-length card is limited to a 10 W maximum power dissipation.
• A x1 low profile card is limited to a 10 W maximum power dissipation.
• A x1 standard height, full-length card is limited to a 10 W maximum power dissipation at initial power up. When the card is configured for high power, by default, it must not exceed a 25 W maximum power dissipation or optionally it must not exceed a 75 W maximum power dissipation. A x4/x8 or a x16 standard height or low profile card is limited to a 25 W maximum power dissipation at initial power up. When a card is configured for high power, it must not exceed a 75 W maximum power dissipation.
As can be seen, the Revision 3.0 info (circa 2013) substantially supersedes the content in this Wikipedia article https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/PCI_Express#Power which is at this point woefully obsolete and inaccurate.
PCI Express Mini -Pin layout, and voltages
editPCI Express Mini Card Pin layout should be included. And, PCI Express Mini voltages are stated 1,5 and 3,3 V, whereas the msata variation is specified 5 V. Could somebody resolve this? 87.185.213.192 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Broken citation
edit: 35–36
in slot power 129.130.18.193 (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Cabling
editThe 'cabling' section stops at OCuLink-2; it looks like PCI-SIG put out standards in early 2024 for PCIe 5.0 (and 6.0) cabling: https://www.anandtech.com/show/21379/pcisig-completes-copprlink-cabling-standard-pcie-50-60-get-wired. This round is called 'CopprLink', not 'OCuLink' -- no more allusion to a dream of eventually including optical cabling. 135.180.194.206 (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Should add: the linked article notes that there is a working group established last year to create an optical cabling standard--so they haven't dropped the dream so much as separated it from the standard they're calling CopprLink.