This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One-nation conservatism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
One-nation conservatism has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a propaganda rant
edit"a paternalistic form" - straight from an ignorant essay written by a 14-year old.
Comment
editThis page is not an encyclopedia article but an opinion piece. It lacks objectivity and is far too informal in style.
- Indeed. Look at the juvenile term 'a paternalistic form' ...
- Yes, I think the penultimate paragraph in particular needs some work. -- Joolz 01:17, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Labour
editIn his 2012 Conference Speech, Ed Miliband, leader of the Labour Party, sought to claim the phrase and apply it to Labour. It has been used by the Labour Party ever since.
It has been used for four months! It's a bit too soon to say that it has been used 'ever since' as though it is a successor to 'New Labour'. At least wait until the election or a change in leader.
Disraeli & Plato (Origin of _Two Nations_)
editDoes Disraeli get his subtitle for _Sybil_ from Plato _Republic_ Book 8 chapter 7 -- 551 D ? Socrates says : That such a city should of necessity be not one, but two, a city of the rich & a city of the poor, dwelling together & always plotting against one another. ? (Shorey in Loeb)