Talk:One-dog policy

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

How did this apply to those who already had dogs?

edit
I'm seeing in one paragraph that you can't have more than one dog per family (or an oversized dog), and in another paragraph aren't allowed to abandon dogs either. So I'm wondering what those who had two dogs (or an oversized dog) was supposed to do with the extra(s)? Were they grandfathered in or not? Jon (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
The BBC article shows that Shanghai, at least, is allowing previously existing dogs to survive. I'm not sure what people're supposed to do with puppies, though. Surely they don't have to give them away the instant they're born? Or are all dogs now required to be sterilized? Soap 20:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proper title

edit

I think the P in Policy should be capitalized (just like in One Child Policy). I have no idea how to do that, though. ThisIsMyWikipediaName (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

One-child policy isn't capitalized (at least not now; maybe it was three years ago). Soap 20:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on One-dog policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply