Talk:Nikki Haley
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nikki Haley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
A fact from Nikki Haley appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Why is there no Controversy section on her signing bombs?
editThere is no way to justify there being no Controversy section on her page when (Redacted). AeonQuark (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- How about WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION? If you want to propose an edit, suggest WP:NPOV text (ie., not a WP:BLP violation like what you wrote above) using WP:RS. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 July 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the Interactions with Donald Trump section to reflect her endorsement of Trump at the RNC on July 16, 2024. 152.133.11.16 (talk) 18:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Left guide (talk) 23:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Prescience
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In "Interactions with Trump" section, before "In March 2024....", please insert:
- In January 2024, she warned, "If Donald Trump becomes the Republican nominee, we will get a President Kamala Harris." Citation: Michael Katz (January 29, 2024), Nikki Haley to Newsmax: Much Time Left to Gain on Trump, Newsmax.
I guess Haley knew before most of us who the Dems would nominate. Thanks. 2602:243:2008:8BB0:F494:276C:D59A:C992 (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for now: Sorry, but that is not a reliable source; please see WP:NEWSMAX. If you can provide a better source that covers this information, feel free to re-activate this request. Left guide (talk) 07:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of irrelevant, unprovable aside.
editI have deleted the following sentence from this entry, as it implies or insinuates a motive for Nikki Haley's resignation as UN Ambassador that is wholly unprovable. Quote:
"Her resignation was announced one day after Trump appeared at a political rally in Mississippi and mocked Christine Blasey Ford, who had accused Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault."
To this sentence is appended a reference citing The Guardian (UK). However, the Guardian article itself quite specifically states: "there is no evidence Trump’s derision of Ford was the immediate trigger for [Haley's] decision."
Correlation is not causation. There is zero evidence (here or elsewhere) that Haley's resignation was related in any way to the Christine Blasey Ford flap. That is merely speculation.
Indeed, to the degree that motive is a valid topic in a Wikipedia article, there are other theories out there that are equally or more believable: e.g., that Haley chose to resign owing to insurmountable conflicts with John Bolton, whom Trump had recently appointed as his National Security Advisor; or, that Haley decided to resign after two years for personal and/or financial reasons, i.e., to make some money in the private sector or to gear up to challenge Trump in the 2024 presidential primaries.
However, these notions, too, are simply speculation, and as such they have no business in a biographical article that seeks to adhere to the facts as known.
09:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC) LewisChessman (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)