Criticism of Donald Trump

edit

He recently began to vehemently criticize Trump for his pro-immigrant and pro-Israel statements in X. Should we still classify him as a Trumpist or a Third Way supporter? 188.163.69.27 (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

We should classify him as WP:RS do. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Christianity should be in infobox

edit

Just like on the page about Osama bin laden on the infobox it says his religion in Sunni Islam. It needs to say Christianity in the infobox on this article because fuentes known for Christian nationalism HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 17:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

bro it needs to be done or there shouldn't be an infobox at all HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 10:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 August 2024

edit

Grammer change in the Personal life section.

Please remove "himself" from the opening sentence. It is not a generally accepted use of the reflexive in this form.

Please change it to "According to Fuentes, he is of Mexican descent via his paternal ancestors and is...."

Thank you. TheOriginalWikiWatcher (talk) 10:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done – Muboshgu (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Anti-Thiel views

edit

Fuentes has positioned himself against Peter Thiel and the network of far-right thinkers affiliated with him. In particular, Fuentes claimed that Curtis Yarvin believes that “non-Jews are incapable of governing themselves and therefore must always be ruled by Jews.” (Yarvin, a Thiel associate whom JD Vance has cited approvingly, is part-Jewish). Given how influential the Thiel crowd has become in today’s GOP, the fact that Fuentes has declared all-out war on them is significant. It shows that the intraparty battles aren’t limited to just “establishment vs. MAGA” anymore, since neither Thiel nor Fuentes are considered to be establishment and both men are usually classified as far-right.2604:2D80:7186:600:0:0:0:1397 (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Q2: Fuentes denies being a white nationalist/white supremacist. Shouldn't the article reflect this?"

edit

I do not dispute the truthness of the allegation. I am not really happy about the way this section of the FAQ is written. It comes off as overly snarky and condescending towards the reader and just not very formal or 'Wiki-like'. The fact that it doesn't bother to even cite the relevant policies doesn't help Trade (talk) 18:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Should imo be included. Do you have a source? misunderstood the question--FMSky (talk) 04:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
How does one include something that's already included? Trade (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree. He might well be all that, but an FAQ should not read like this. Would second removal of Q2 for the time being. Biohistorian15 (talk) 10:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I removed Q2. The article has mentioned Fuentes's denial since 2021, and the FAQ wasn't created until 2022. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Should we add an video of Fuentes to the article?

edit

There are two of them on Commons Trade (talk) 02:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply