Q2: The article's sources have a left-wing bias, or are otherwise unreliable. If Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, shouldn't the sources used in the article be more balanced?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
This article's subject has mentioned it in the past.
Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
He recently began to vehemently criticize Trump for his pro-immigrant and pro-Israel statements in X. Should we still classify him as a Trumpist or a Third Way supporter? 188.163.69.27 (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Just like on the page about Osama bin laden on the infobox it says his religion in Sunni Islam. It needs to say Christianity in the infobox on this article because fuentes known for Christian nationalism HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 17:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Fuentes has positioned himself against Peter Thiel and the network of far-right thinkers affiliated with him. In particular, Fuentes claimed that Curtis Yarvin believes that “non-Jews are incapable of governing themselves and therefore must always be ruled by Jews.” (Yarvin, a Thiel associate whom JD Vance has cited approvingly, is part-Jewish). Given how influential the Thiel crowd has become in today’s GOP, the fact that Fuentes has declared all-out war on them is significant. It shows that the intraparty battles aren’t limited to just “establishment vs. MAGA” anymore, since neither Thiel nor Fuentes are considered to be establishment and both men are usually classified as far-right.2604:2D80:7186:600:0:0:0:1397 (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 days ago5 comments4 people in discussion
I do not dispute the truthness of the allegation. I am not really happy about the way this section of the FAQ is written. It comes off as overly snarky and condescending towards the reader and just not very formal or 'Wiki-like'. The fact that it doesn't bother to even cite the relevant policies doesn't help Trade (talk) 18:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply