Talk:Missouri Route 164/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ed! in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


Taking a look at this one. —Ed!(talk) 03:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    History
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    Pass Seeing no gaps in coverage. Cites are favored toward maps but good.
  3. It is broad in its coverage:
    Pass Though I do think the traffic counts and costs of the infrastructure are an important part of the article.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    Pass no problems there.
  5. It is stable:
    Pass No problems there.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    Pass though is it possible to include a map?
  7. Other:
    Dup links, dab links, external links and copyvio tool all check out. —Ed!(talk) 03:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
    • Source spotcheck Ref 6, Ref 14 and Ref 24 all line up with what's cited in the article.

On Hold Pending a few minor fixes. —Ed!(talk) 03:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Ed!: Thanks for the review.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 05:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Good work on this one! Passing for GA. —Ed!(talk) 20:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply