Talk:Millions More Movement

Crowd size?

Given the controversy/debate that ensued following the Million Man March, I think it would be beneficial to include the estimated/official crowd sizes (when each becomes available). - Refugee621 02:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

---

This blog have two pictures, side by side of the attendence, this year, and 10 years past. Anyone want to try posting this as NPOV? 66.173.192.96 02:18, 21 October 2005 (UTC) http://www.independentconservative.com/2005/10/16/not_a_million/

---

Updating

This page, and Louis Farrakhan, are in major need of updating. freestylefrappe 23:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

---

Is there really any point in including, at the bottom, the "link to a weblog critical of the MMM"? It doesn't point to the relevant post, so it seems like self-promotion on the blogger's part.

Also, can anyone find a link to transcripts of the speeches? I'd like to post specific details of Mr. Farrakhan's speech, but they would be rejected as nonsense unless I can prove he actually said it.

Trivia

I deleted this section. Whether or not the crowd exceeded 1 million is the subject of some controversy. A research study cited in the 'Million Man March' article states that one million people was within the error estimate, and the people who organised the march estimated much higher. In contrast the police estimated much lower. Given that, it is erroneous for us to state with certainty the number who attended either march. --Davril2020 06:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Non-trivia

But at the moment there is absolutely nothing in the article to indicate how much impact this event made. Carina22 20:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Ifsomeone wants to source the details of the impact, they can put it in. However its prior presentation was entirely inappropriate. --Davril2020 22:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Millions More Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223140/http://www.mmmhouston.net/ to http://www.mmmhouston.net/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051027003053/http://www.mmmstlouis.org/ to http://www.mmmstlouis.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060105225301/http://www.gkcchapterloc.org/ to http://www.gkcchapterloc.org/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thecapitaldistrictloc.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051027014423/http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/EA84EBA3-C6CB-4594-9A57-264A178DC756.htm to http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/EA84EBA3-C6CB-4594-9A57-264A178DC756.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)