This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
A fact from Mercy dog appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
New enough, long enough and within policy. (The lead could be expanded a bit with a few words about post-WWI dogs, but for DYK purposes the article is more than fine as it is right now.) The hook is excellent (though very melancholic) and supported by an inline citation (not the same supplied in the nomination above, though, and not accessible for me but AGF. The one above furthermore supports the hook, so no problem here.) No image, QPQ has been done. This should be good to go. It was a fascinating read, though very sad. Yakikaki (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
New enough, long enough and within policy. (The lead could be expanded a bit with a few words about post-WWI dogs, but for DYK purposes the article is more than fine as it is right now.) The hook is excellent (though very melancholic) and supported by an inline citation (not the same supplied in the nomination above, though, and not accessible for me but AGF. The one above furthermore supports the hook, so no problem here.) No image, QPQ has been done. This should be good to go. It was a fascinating read, though very sad. Yakikaki (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)