Talk:Mary Douglas
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editShe modified her view on kashrut, saying that her classification theory actually did not apply well... see her Leviticus book. Later on that...--dalegrett 14:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
This article should make more of the significance of Douglas's book Natural Symbols, and I don't think the online course deserves its own section. Unless someone comments here I intend to make these changes.Fourcultures (talk) 06:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Purity and Danger has its own article. Wouldn't it make sense to move the summary (i.e. everything between "The line of enquiry..." and "...positive (dirt affirming) or otherwise.") there? --Satsuma-alex (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Nobody seems to object, so I'm doing it. --Satsuma-alex (talk) 06:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mary Douglas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060522074729/http://www.unine.ch/ethno/biblio/2000douglas.html to http://www.unine.ch/ethno/biblio/2000douglas.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)