A fact from Mary Birdsall appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana Historical Society, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indiana Historical Society-related articles and topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indiana Historical SocietyWikipedia:GLAM/Indiana Historical SocietyTemplate:WikiProject Indiana Historical SocietyIndiana Historical Society
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Temperance and Prohibition, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Temperance and ProhibitionWikipedia:WikiProject Temperance and ProhibitionTemplate:WikiProject Temperance and ProhibitionTemperance and Prohibition
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As a project for my Wiki Scholars program, I have done extensive research on Mary Birdsall and made essentially an entirely revised article that is fully cited and (hopefully) completely accurate.--Biotech46 (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi @Biotech46: nice to see the amount of work you've put in! Things that you did really well:
I feel that this was definitely written with a neutral point of view. Maintaining neutral tone and word choice can be difficult, especially when writing about people or topics about which we feel strongly!
Excellent use of citations. This all looks really well supported.
I have a few small suggestions for improvement--
Per the Wikipedia Manual of Style, the subjects of biographies should be referred to by their surnames after the first usage of their first and last name together. You wouldn't write the George Washington article calling him just "George", for example. Refer to Mary Birdsall as "Birdsall" or "Mary Birdsall" in instances of confusion with her husband or children, for example.
Similar to the surname policy above, you can ditch honorific titles such as "Mrs." as you have for "Mrs. Bloomer" and "Ms. Way"
Similar once more, the title "Dr." is infrequently used on Wikipedia unless it is part of a stage name or other pseudonym. I see this at least once with "Dr. Mary F. Thomas" (policy link here)
There are some minor formatting issues. Per the Manual of Style again, section titles should be in sentence case, not title case. Therefore, only the first word of a section title (and any proper nouns) are capitalized. So instead of "Journalism Career" as one section, it would be "Journalism career"
Make sure you italicize newspaper titles, even when they appear in section or subsection titles. So this refers to your subsection Indiana Farmer and The Lily.
Book titles are also italicized. In the Mary Birdsall house section, you should italicize the Beecher book title American Woman's Home
In your section on The Lily, you don't need the hyphen in "newly-formed" (policy link here)
Counterintuitive to how most Americans write, Wikipedia articles are written with the punctuation on the outside of the quotation mark, known as logical quotation. This is a hard one for me to remember, as it is not how I was educated to write! So instead of Her speech was described as "a clear and logical plea in behalf of the right of suffrage in woman." you would have Her speech was described as "a clear and logical plea in behalf of the right of suffrage in woman". I see a few other instances of this that could be adjusted
"House" and "Senate" are proper nouns--make sure they are capitalized consistently
In the legacy section, it appears that you are rehashing content that appears in other sections of the body. The only place where content should be duplicated is if it appears both in the lead and the body. Otherwise, it appears three times in the article that her home was listed in the National Register of Historic Places.
.jpg){kind=small}