Talk:Maria Sophia of Neuburg
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Maria Sofia Isabel de Neuburgo from pt.wikipedia. |
Untitled
editI have added her place of birth. 24.31.169.252 (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Six years?
edit"stepdaughter Isabel Luísa herself being merely six years younger than Marie Sophie"... birth Isabel Luisa : 1669 - birth Marie Sophie : 1666... That doesn't make six years...
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Maria Sophia of the Palatinate → Maria Sophia of Neuburg – The User:Surtsicna moved the page without any move request or consensus. He has provided no sources, argument, nor well-reasoned rationale for the move. I ask that the article be moved to its name prior to his unhelpful move. Should he like to move it back, he must open a discussion. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support I don't care whether her given names end with "a" or "e", but I know this Wittelsbach princess historically as a daughter of Neuburg. L'Allemagne Dynastique Tome IV, Wittelsbach, 1985, p.199 specifically states that, although her father succeeded as Elector Palatine in 1685 (briefly, before being driven into exile and dying in Vienna in 1690 without having recovered the Palatinate), and she married in 1687, her title until marriage was "Countess Palatine at Neuburg" -- and it is with the Neuburg branch of her family that she is specifically associated. At the very least, this should have been pursued by a move request. FactStraight (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support. I was bold enough to act as I thought it right, as advised. Thank you, FactStraight, for explaining why I was wrong. Had Cristiano Tomás not failed to assume good faith, he would have noticed that the last move was much better explained than any of the other four moves performed in the last four years and that the former title was not the result of any move request or consensus either. Surtsicna (talk) 13:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)