Wikipedia

Talk:Malaysia–Philippines relations

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Chipmunkdavis in topic Malaysia support for the MNLF
Learn more about this page

File:Coats of arms malaysia.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

An image used in this article, File:Coats of arms malaysia.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Malaysia–Philippines relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Malaysia–Philippines relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Malaysia–Philippines relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Malaysia–Philippines relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Malaysia support for the MNLF

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago13 comments3 people in discussion

As per ChipmunkDavis revert here (http://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Malaysia%E2%80%93Philippines_relations&action=history), he said:

"source does not support idea that massacres of Filipino Muslims was somehow some sort of justified action against the Malaysian government"

@Chipmunkdavis isn't it clearly put in the news article that the formation of MNLF Muslim anti Filipino Insurgent Group in Malaysia to infiltrate Muslim Mindanao in 1969 was before the 1970s Martial Law massacres of Malaysian supported MNLF insurgents?

The timing is pretty obvious how Malaysians attacked first. Yet you selectively erase this inconvenient truth, on Malaysia's part.

Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Extrapolating cause and effect from timing is WP:OR. Such a statement would need direct sourcing, and would need to be written in an encyclopaedic tone. As for the meritless personal attack, I suggest this is something you should withdraw. CMD (talk) 15:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Im open to have the statement modified to mutually satisfy us, what then should you propose would be a better presentation as per the sources mentioned?
Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also lol at the accusations of me directly quoting from the source, being "non neutral" POV. We both know that you are non neutral too, you are the largest contributor to the Wikipedia project for Malaysia. You are very personally invested in Malaysia...
(https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wiki.x.io/Malaysia)
I also admit that I am also personally invested the Philippines since I am your Filipino counterpart.
(https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/en.wiki.x.io/Philippines)
If we cannot amicably agree on a mutually satisfactory solution. I suggest we ask for intervention from more neutral editors.
@Austronesier since you have been fair to me, correcting me when I'm wrong and also applauding me when I'm right do chime in on this topic.
Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 15:37, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr.: I will not chime in before you don't strike out that shit about other editors being "personally invested" blah blah. WP is not a proxy battleground. Accusing Chipmunkdavis of such a mentality is baseless. If you claim such an attitude for yourself, that's entirely credible from your record, but not productive for our shared engagement in this encyclopedic project. I could use even harsher words and still remain fair and neutral. –Austronesier (talk) 15:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you have that opinion on me, its fine by me. I invited someone who is willing to antagonize me to show that I am willing to compromise. This isnt about me by the way. Its about the sources and issue at hand. Is it not true that I directly quoted from the source? If it does not satisify me nor Chipmunkdavis, what iteration or modification of the statement true to the source, do you think would be sufficient to satisfy us both?
Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 15:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Of course it is about you. You apparently cannot enter into a discussion without insinuating a bias on the part of your interlocutor (which you derive from edit counts, seriously?); that's poor ad hominem-style reasoning.
Another thing that's poor is the sourcing for the statement the "Malaysia [...] founded the anti government MNLF in 1969". You provide a 1976 quote that does not even support the founding role of "Malaysia". First of all, the source speaks about the "Malaysian government", not the country of Malaysia. Secondly the source says that the Malaysian government provided training, transportation, weapons, and ammunition. No mention of manpower and financing. Thirdly, there is no mention of Malayia or its government as the "founder" of the MNLF. No, you have not directly from the source. –Austronesier (talk) 16:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok I see. I should remove the other mentions then, confine it to only the Malaysian government but not Malaysia as a whole and just stick to training, transportation, weapons, and ammunition and that it was organized in Palau Pangkor, West Malaysia, but not founded there as per source. Is it that a better iteration?
Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 16:23, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also drop "anti-Philippine" or "anti-government" when the source says "anti-regime" and "anti-Marcos". –Austronesier (talk) 16:37, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok obliged. Thank You Austronesier for your fair and balanced critique. :) Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 16:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
None of this should be in that area at all. The existing text is already an odd diversion into general history from the specific topic of the 2013 Lahad Datu standoff. It should be removed, with the possibility of reshaping it into something more well-placed and relevant, rather than more decades-old stuff being added to where it is. CMD (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree it should be chronologically placed earlier in the article. :)
Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 16:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please revert, the current text still delves into SYNTH and retains a lack of relation to the area it's in. CMD (talk) 01:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Malaysia–Philippines_relations&oldid=1208732928"