Talk:M. M. Warburg & Co.

Opening heading

Where do you get that employee number from? I got mine of 'more than 1, 000' from the company web site at http://www.mmwarburg.com/web/mmwarburg/mmwarburg.html

Über 1000 Mitarbeiter arbeiten in der Warburg Gruppe an sechs Standorten in Deutschland sowie an weiteren Standorten im benachbarten Ausland.

which in my, admittedly very scanty, understanding of German means something like:

More than 1000 colleagues work in the Warbug group on six locations in Germany as well as on further locations in neighbouring countries.

Do correct me of course if I've got this wrong, but otherwise I'm going to change it back - Crosbiesmith 20:11, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I took the number from the 2003 annual report (in English). If the report figure is just the core company, and the figure you quote is the wider group, then your figure is probably better. Noisy | Talk 21:05, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

M.M.Warburg & CO → M. M. Warburg & Co. – Per naming conventions, this article should be moved. The company's website might spell the name with this stylized wordart, M.M.Warburg & CO, but just like we neither capitalize Sony, nor lower case HTC Corporation, we should here, too, obey conventions of spelling and naming. (See also Merck Finck & Co., White Weld & Co., G. H. Walker & Co., Harris Williams & Co., Mendelssohn & Co., for similar cases) bender235 (talk) 22:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

• Support as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Rename the site

Hi, the name of the bankhouse is not correct. I rename it in the article but the name of the article is not right, too. So somebody rename the article from M.M.Warburg & CO to M.M.Warburg & Co. in 2011. That is an incorrect notation. So look at the site of the bankhouse, there you can find the correct one  !

Kind regards Katret (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

References