Talk:Live from Paris (Shakira album)

Page Title Might Need to Be Changed

I was wondering if anyone thought the page title should be changed to En Vivo Desde Paris? I think we should do this after the album is released in the U.S. to make sure this is the version were getting. I pre-ordered the CD/DVD edition online from Amazon and I have noticed a lot of pre-ording sites in America have used the Spanish title. Just like all other Shakira releases the title for America's wiki is for the edition released IN America.

                                                         Pderrick13  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pderrick13 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC) 

File:Antes de las seis.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Antes de las seis.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Antes de las seis.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Live from Paris (Shakira album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 20:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

General overview

• Disambiguation links: Not present.
• Checklinks: Nothing to be corrected.
• Original research: Latin pop and world music should be removed from infobox, as that information is not supported in the body of the article itself.

Removed. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

In depth

0. Lead and infobox

• Lead → Second paragraph → Include just some words about Shakira's overly sexual performance being criticized.

Added. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

• Infobox → Please remove the second date and from the first date, exclude "(Worldwide)". It's not necessary.

Removed. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

1. Background and release

• "The formats included the full performances of 22 songs, and buyers with an all-access pass were able to view behind-the-scenes documentary footage of the shows." → "The formats included the full performances of 22 songs, along with behind-the-scenes documentary footage of the shows.". I'm asking you to modify this because I went to the archive URL and the "all-access pass" is just the footage, not a real pass, and the sentence may lead some readers to believe it is.

Modified. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

• "on December 6, 2011" → "on the following day"

Changed. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

2. Critical reception

• The ratings are a bit misleading, aren't they? The Allmusic writer actually praises the set but gives it 3 stars... anyway, by what the reviews say, we can consider them mostly positive, though by the scores it should appear as mixed. I don't know what to say on this one. I guess you should change to "mixed to positive"... I really don't know.

That is why I kept it to generally favourable, and actually only the EW review is mixed. Otherwise, there's mostly positive stuff. I must agree that the ratings are misleading. But considering this, the Allmusic rating is 60/100 and About.com rating is 90/100 which does seem to side towards positive. But I didn't keep it "positive reviews" to keep in mind the EW review and made it "generally favourable." --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

• You could merge this section with Commercial performance, give them level 3 headers (Critical reaction / Commercial performance) and put them under a level 2 'Reception'. I think it would look better. It's up to you, really.

That's a nice suggestion! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

6. Charts

• Merge with certifications... (I know I say this in every GA review, haha)

I beg to differ here. Actually Live from Paris has certifications different for Album and DVD, and that will look excessively cluttered in the column two of charts. Moreover, it is not necessary for charts and certifications to be in the same section. I did that for the songs because they were only a few. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Final comments

I absolutely loved to read this article. I was actually hoping to buy this some years ago but I bought Sale el Sol instead. Anyway, just correct those errors and I'll pass it. Prism △ 20:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dressing Rooms?

Seriously? Wikipedia really needs all this trivial rubbish, does it? 99.247.1.157 (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)