Talk:List of premiers of New Brunswick

List of premiers of New Brunswick is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 26, 2008	Featured list candidate	Promoted

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: New Brunswick / Governments / Politics High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:John Babington Macaulay Baxter.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:John Babington Macaulay Baxter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Charles Dow Richards.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Charles Dow Richards.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Allison Dysart dates.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Allison Dysart dates.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Richardhatfield.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image Image:Richardhatfield.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image available for George E. King

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just pointing out that there's a public domain image on Wikipedia for George E King that can be used in this table: File:George Edwin King.jpg. I'd add it myself but after several tries I'm buggered if I know how to do it without wrecking the table. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Could you unlock the page? Moatassemakmal (talk) 11:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 14:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

can you end the lock on Sunday? 41.69.10.79 (talk) 07:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. Cannolis (talk) 08:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

could you end the block tomorrow please I'll do anything? 197.132.232.255 (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Would you say why? Edit requests are for requesting an edit be made to the article on your behalf. Please read Wikipedia:Edit requests. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 05:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unofficial/Official affiliations

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Perhaps it's just me being an Upper Canadian, but I'm confused by this distinction. Though political parties were not registered in New Brunswick before 1935, they existed and were recognized as such. Parties in the UK weren't recognized in law until 1998 (though they were implicitly provided for in legislation from the early 20th century); the modern system of party registration in federal elections didn't exist before 1968, but in either case, they were certainly official long before then. What's the difference here? Does it have to do with representation in Cabinet? It would seem that at the very least, the party system was official by 1917, when MLAs declared their party affiliation to the Speaker. Just asking is all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geoff K. (talk • contribs) 03:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 18 October 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

could you undo indefinite protection block tomorrow so I could add more details I swear never misuse image to regain my trust please? 41.69.14.209 (talk) 20:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. --Stabila711 (talk) 22:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 18 October 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

could you undo indefinite protection block tomorrow so I could add more details I swear never misuse image to regain my trust please? 41.69.14.209 (talk) 20:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Not done This is not how the edit request process works. To make an "edit request", you need to provide the specific details of a specific edit that needs to be made to the article, such as a specific addition or correction — and then somebody else will make that change for you if it is appropriate and correct. Edit requests do not get you blanket carte blanche unlocks of semiprotection so that you can do the edit yourself — that is a request that will always be declined regardless of how many times you make it, because it is not what the edit request process is for. Either provide the specific details of a specific edit that needs to be made to the article, or go away. Bearcat (talk) 13:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

List of premiers of New Brunswick

List of premiers of New Brunswick (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 41.69.12.2 (talk) 09:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC) 41.69.12.2 (talk) 09:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not done the article is already protected, and there has been one edit to the article this year and there was one in 2015 - neither of which was vandalism - whereas your request .... - Arjayay (talk) 09:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

can you terminate the semi-protection block from this article? 41.69.12.2 (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not done: The place to request that protection be altered or removed is at Requests for page protection. Thanks, /wiae ★ /tlk 22:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2016

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 13:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of premiers of New Brunswick

List of premiers of New Brunswick (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotection: From full protection to template editor protection Mo 105.199.169.148 (talk) 06:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not done No reason given why this is needed, and the request is from a blocked user who's perennially disruptive about misusing the edit request process to make page unprotection requests without actually giving details about any needed edits. Get a new hobby and leave us the hell alone, Mo. Bearcat (talk) 22:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on List of premiers of New Brunswick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on List of premiers of New Brunswick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of premiers of New Brunswick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611205203/http://www.gnb.ca/legis/leglibbib/special_projects/premiers.asp to http://www.gnb.ca/legis/leglibbib/special_projects/premiers.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of premiers of New Brunswick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply