Talk:List of The Young and the Restless characters introduced in 2011

File:Primrose Deville Young and the Restless 2011.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:Primrose Deville Young and the Restless 2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Genevieve Atkinson Young and the Restless 2011.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Angelina Young and the Restless 2011.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Harmony Young and the Restless 2011.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Genevieve Atkinson

Hello,

I think Genevieve Atkinson should definitely have her own page by now. She has been a crushial part of the show since last summer and has affected many lives. Can we form a consensus of this matter? -Regards: Allukka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allukka (talk • contribs) 13:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

No. She isn't verifiable enough to warrant her own page. She's only been on the series a little over a year. And just because she was almost married to Jack, which some will disagree, mean she warrant her own page. Also, Allukka, please remember to sign your post. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 19:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

Well, alright, I suppose this matter can still wait. But I reserve the right to bring this matter up again next summer, if the character is still in place. I suspect her significance will grow as the show goes on. I have to point out, time frame is NOT the only thing which determines a characters significance, for instance, Sabrina Newman was on for 9 months and still she has her own page. And already now I think Genevieve has done more on the show than Sabrina did.

Yes I have noticed that the signing doesn't come to my posts. I haven't found out yet how to do my signature :)

Allukka 19:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allukka (talk • contribs)

Next summer? Are you serious? That doesn't mean she'll be able to have her own page. And just because Sabrina has a page, doesn't mean she should. We're busy reconstructing the pages. I'll still say no during the summer. She's not verifiable enough of a character to warrant her own page. And timeframe IS what warrants the page. And it doesn't matter if you have a signature or not, you have to sign your posts, regardless. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 19:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Personally, once 2-2.5 years have past, i would look into making her a page. Arrekea 11:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me? She most definitely DOES warrant her own page, she's warranted it for quite some time now. And much more than some other characters on the show. Who do you think you are saying she doesn't? First of all, she was a significant part and antagonist on the summer storyline of Lily & Cane, ant in her relationship with Jack, and now she most certainly is even bigger with owning Beauty of Nature and having dealings with Victor, who is the show's leading male actor. And of course Sabrina can be used as an example. The next summer thing was only because then it will be a year from when she first came on the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allukka (talk • contribs) 23:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

And as for the signature, my comment was supposed to be a light ending to the convo, meaning: I do not know HOW to sign! I do now.

Allukka 23:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Allukka, your reasoning is a bit sub-par for me. It makes no sense. Soap pages are changing, so please, just follow. She could have all she has now, and still be gone from the show in two months, or even two days. She does not warrant a page, she isn't a valid character enough yet. Get over it. Who do you think you are saying she does? And the signing goes next to your post, not under it. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 18:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Who do I think I am? I am someone who has followed this show for 13 years, and I think I have a little perspective on this matter. You do not own Wikipedia nor this page, and you do not get to call (all) the shots. I do not understand how this doesn't make sense to you. We've already established that timeframe or the plotline doesn't determine whether a character gets their own page or not. So what else is there? I don't get why you would be so opposed to this. And the matter that "soap pages are changing" doesn't mean we should diminish them or remove them. Quite on the contrary, we should keep alive the "last" pages we have, just because of the reason they are lessening. As a soap fan I would think you of all people would understand that. 62.113.163.80 (talk) 13:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Some characters do not belong in this list...

Can I ask why some characters that made their debuts before the year 2011 are featured in this list?Rain the 1 23:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I think, from what I've understood, is that it's when they've been most prominently known? I am unsure, you'd have to ask Arre about that one. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 00:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Hopefully she will notice this discussion. :) Well it makes sense to keep it from when then debuted - as the title states that it is for 2011 characters.Rain the 1 00:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I agree. It's something Arre will have to discuss on with us. I have no objections on which page they belong, though, that could mean creating pages back into the 1970s, which could be quite tough. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 00:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

True. Tbh, my reasoning was for this - i didn't know how many pages i was going to create (and how many years back) but i wanted to make put as many characters in that i could. I'm not sure if ill make sure, but for characters like Ricky+Harmony when their year is created then i think they can be moved. But i think its better leaving them here instead of the MINOR characters page with is a big behind mess XD lmfao. Im not actually going to leave them there..its just a temporary thing :) Arrekea 12:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Days of Our Lives characters (1960s) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Days of Our Lives characters (1960s) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)