Talk:Lexicology

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 February 2021 and 22 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rosetoval99.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 10 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kristakonecny.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Lexicography vs. Lexicology

Seems from what I can scrape up that Lexicography, the making of dictionaries, uses the study of words and their meanings, Lexicology

'Noted lexicologists'?

I'm surprised at the people in the list of noted lexicologists. Surely Johnson, Larousse and Webster were lexicographers, not lexicologists, while Barthes was a specialist in literary criticism and semiotics. Dougg 09:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

A special term for study of neologisms?

Is there special term for study of neologisms (as a part of lexicology) in English linguistic terminology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.105.213.130 (talk) 06:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Root, suffix, prefix, ending...

Are these parts of a word morphological or lexicological units? Or is there the difference between root (lexicology) (or root (semantics)) and root (morphology)? There is a separate article on word stem too, and it tells that all roots belong to stems but not vice versa and stems sometimes have morphological meaning (as contrasted to roots? Do roots have only lexicological meaning?).

Puzzled, Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lexicology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070707050350/http://coral.lili.uni-bielefeld.de/Classes/Winter99/GSdictionary/CompLex/node2.html to http://coral.lili.uni-bielefeld.de/Classes/Winter99/GSdictionary/CompLex/node2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Surprising Error in This Article

The article states: "The term [lexicology] first appeared in the 1970s." Perhaps the writer is not aware of a reference work called the Oxford English Dictionary. This work, which is pretty well known and which one would think someone working on an article on Lexicology would consult, documents the term back to 1832. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.173.152 (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted bibliography

Hello fellow editors,

I recently made edits throughout this article - in summary, I made the article more concise and reworded existing information, as well as added some new info with plenty more citations. The most significant change I made was removing the Bibliography section; i felt that it was redundant given both a References section and an External links section. But perhaps someone could review the old content and re-add it in the form of citations or further reading(s) if they feel the sources should remain with this article.

Thank you for reviewing my changes! Rosetoval99 (talk) 00:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)