Talk:Laramans/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

• This article passes GA status - well written, almost no edits or changes needed. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is remarkably clear. Good writing. Made a few minor tweaks myself. Pass.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Pass, no issues.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Citations are good - well referenced, clear attribution to academic sources.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Largely academic sources, some reliable news and other sources. Pass.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Pass, no notable issues.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Pass - no issues found.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Pass, no other major things found.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Pass, level of detail is good.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Potentially controversial topic - reliance on reliable academic sources and clear attribution. Pass.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Pass, no issues.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Pass, no issues found.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are frequent and well-chosen/captioned.
	7. Overall assessment.