![]() | Laramans has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 29, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
editKtrimi991 when you get a moment, give it a read.--Calthinus (talk) 04:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Calthinus, te lumshin duart :) I made some edits there some years ago but never had the time to make more. This article deservers attention. Very interesting topic. Ktrimi991 (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Βατο could I request your help with standardizing some of these cites? I know you're good at that :). --Calthinus (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nice job Calthinus! I will do it soon ;) – Βατο (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Βατο think we could nom this for DYK or GA? --Calthinus (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Calthinus yes, it is well written, even for a GA nominee. – Βατο (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please give me a ping if my presence is requested here, as I'm trying to take a bit of a break, but can check back for constructive purposes. Though any help is appreciated BATO.--Calthinus (talk) 07:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Laramans/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- This article passes GA status - well written, almost no edits or changes needed. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |