Talk:Lady Apache

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lady Apache. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120727024409/http://www.record.com.mx/luchalibre/2011-09-11/volador-jr-reta-la-sombra to http://www.record.com.mx/luchalibre/2011-09-11/volador-jr-reta-la-sombra
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141214192421/http://www.wrestleview.com/featured-articles/52141-viva-la-raza-lucha-weekly-for-12-14-14 to http://www.wrestleview.com/featured-articles/52141-viva-la-raza-lucha-weekly-for-12-14-14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lady Apache/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 14:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

• It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
• It contains copyright infringements -
• It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
• It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Prose

Lede

• Do we need to link Mexican? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• González's ring name comes from the "family name" of Mario Balbuena González who wrestled under the name Gran Apache; whom she was married to when she made her wrestling debut in 1986, but later divorced. - I'd move this down, and explain a bit better, it's a bit confusing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• First paragraph is about the lineage, rather than what they are notable for. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• Infobox is full of citations, most could be in prose. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

General

• Mexico City, Mexico[1] - missing punct. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• ring name Gran Apache. - reword to avoid SEAOFBLUE. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• career, and married - remove comma. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• Electroshock / Mr. Electro - could we write this in prose rather than like this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• No images at all in this article? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• Could we explain what Luchas de Apuestas is in that section? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• Is there nothing we could use for a professional wrestling persona section? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Mostly issues with the lede, which needs tightening up. Placing on hold. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
    • I don't really have good sources on her ring persona, not enough to build a whole section IMO. I have addressed the rest I think. MPJ-DK (talk) 02:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
      • That's a shame - hopefully in the future there will be a bit more on this. Otherwise, I'm happy to promote. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)