Talk:Ladera Heights, California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities C‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ladera Heights, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ladera Heights, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External Link removal Request

Originally attempted to remove the below census reference. I am new to editing and this is not my primary career field however after viewing potential places to move to near LA I came across the below reference and found it odd and out of place. I can provide articles to support bias in American society towards blacks or discrimination in housing practices but having used Wikipedia for several years now I have never seen use of this type of reference before in a demographic section. I still respectfully request its removal unless there is proof highlighting the top ten areas of the majority ethinc/racial group is standard practice on Wikipedia? I will spend the next several days viewing each area of LA in Wikipedia for a similar reference. If by 16 February 2019, there a no objections or proof this is common practice for the demographic section I will assume silence is consent and re-revert the change of its removal and recommend a Wikipedia article specific to the LA Times article referenced as an alternative.

In the year 2000, these were the ten neighborhoods in Los Angeles County with the largest percentage of black residents:^[1]

View Park-Windsor Hills, California, 86.5%
Gramercy Park, Los Angeles, 86.4%
Leimert Park, Los Angeles, 79.6%
Manchester Square, Los Angeles, 78.6%
Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw, Los Angeles, 71.3%
Ladera Heights, California, 71%
Hyde Park, Los Angeles, 66%
Chesterfield Square, Los Angeles, 58.6%
West Rancho Dominguez, California, 57.6%
Westmont, California, 57.5%

^ "Mapping L.A." Los Angeles Times.

Add topic

[1] "Mapping L.A." Los Angeles Times.

[1]