Talk:Kate Upton
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Gråbergs Gråa Sång in topic Expired Account
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kate Upton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Kate Upton. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Kate Upton at the Reference desk. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Leaked photos
editSee Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLP issue at Kate Upton: leaked photos Jytdog (talk) 01:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- I object to the naming of this issue above and on the notice board. It is sexist and dismissive and rude. As a woman I am totally offended by the heading as well as the fact that content, which I found offensive and which was obviously harmful to the subject of this BLP article (which is why I removed it), was restored. -- BrillLyle (talk) 10:23, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Tweaked section heading and link in OP a bit per change made by Kingsindian at WP:BLPN#BLP issue at Kate Upton: leaked photos and WP:TPG#Section headings. @Jytdog and BrillLyle: I hope the new heading is acceptable to both of you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- It's fine. Jytdog (talk) 06:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Tweaked section heading and link in OP a bit per change made by Kingsindian at WP:BLPN#BLP issue at Kate Upton: leaked photos and WP:TPG#Section headings. @Jytdog and BrillLyle: I hope the new heading is acceptable to both of you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- It's not about what is "acceptable to both." It is about what is not offensive. It is about reinforcing sexism and re-abusing someone who has been victimized. I think this is very clear, but what do I know. Apparently I know nothing and only male editors on Wikipedia can take action or have a voice. But yeah, thanks for changing. I know this was hard. -- BrillLyle (talk) 23:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- @BrillLyle: Not hard at all and in fact even allowed per WP:TPG#Section headings, regardless of one's gender. "Acceptable to both" was just meant as a courtesy to see if there was a consensus for this change since the two of you had previously posted in the thread; it had nothing to doing with
only male editors on Wikipedia can take action or have a voice
; in fact, I don't think I've stated I'm male anywhere in any of the ongoing discussions about this or claimed that being male gives anyone any special privaledges when it comes to editing. Moreover, just in case you missed it, I did suggest changing the BLPN section heading and the talk page heading at the very beginning of this post. FWIW, your gender has never even crossed my mind with respect to any of the posts I made and I believe I've kept my comments focused on relevant policies and guidelines, and not other editors. Now, if you'd prefer that the section heading be further changed, be bold and change it yourself or suggest something different. If you do change it, keep in mind the fifth paragraph of MOS:HEAD (which discussed such changes), and add an WP:ANCHOR if needed to preserve any links. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- @BrillLyle: Not hard at all and in fact even allowed per WP:TPG#Section headings, regardless of one's gender. "Acceptable to both" was just meant as a courtesy to see if there was a consensus for this change since the two of you had previously posted in the thread; it had nothing to doing with
- It's not about what is "acceptable to both." It is about what is not offensive. It is about reinforcing sexism and re-abusing someone who has been victimized. I think this is very clear, but what do I know. Apparently I know nothing and only male editors on Wikipedia can take action or have a voice. But yeah, thanks for changing. I know this was hard. -- BrillLyle (talk) 23:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kate Upton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110623165225/http://www.equinechronicle.com/lifestyle/apha-youth-exhibitor-finds-success-as-international-fashion-model.html to http://www.equinechronicle.com/lifestyle/apha-youth-exhibitor-finds-success-as-international-fashion-model.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110925025557/http://www.fhm.com/girls/news/kate-upton-is-milking-cows-for-complex-82079 to http://www.fhm.com/girls/news/kate-upton-is-milking-cows-for-complex-82079
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Expired Account
edithttp://www.kateupton.com/ seems to be expired. Remove? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gprobins (talk • contribs) 15:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)