Talk:Judith Jarvis Thomson

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joshua Brush (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Pearman77.

Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Assessment

WP:BIO

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

For those seeking to improve this page, I have found a useful article with citations about Dr. Thomson - http://philrsss.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/people/Thomson.pdf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.99.223.201 (talk) 02:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Religious affiliation

An editor has recently identified Judith Jarvis Thomson as Jewish, based on a web site called www.adherents.com. Since this web site is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards, I propose that the change should be reverted. In any case, prominent listing of a subject's religious affiliation, for example in the opening sentence, is often criticized unless there is some clue in the body of the article that their choice of religion was important in their life. Such a fact that would have to be shown from reliable sources. If any of Judith Thomson's publications mentions Judaism, there would be a stronger case. Since adherents.com is not a suitable source, and Judaism is not mentioned anywhere else in the article, I believe that the assertion should be removed. In context, and if there is proper evidence, it might be restored, though preferably not in the opening sentence. EdJohnston (talk) 01:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I know Judith Thomson, and she is Jewish. I agree, though, that the affiliation is probably not relevant to the article, and definitely doesn't belong in the opening sentence.P.D. (talk) 03:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, see this: http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/thomson-judith-jarvis JimFarm (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Common words linked in the text

Per WP:OVERLINK I suggest that common words such as husband and professor do not need to be blue links in the text. The policy recommends to "..avoid linking terms whose meaning can be understood by most readers of the English Wikipedia." Unless people object, I am planning to remove these links. EdJohnston (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judith Jarvis Thomson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050719075327/http://davidhildebrand.org/teaching/courses/thomson.php to http://davidhildebrand.org/teaching/courses/thomson.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)