Talk:Jedi (game engine)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2600:1700:DA90:2AB0:DD01:7756:8B1D:A60C in topic 'True 3D'

'True 3D'

edit

A few points:

--DocumentN (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Underworld games did have limited vertical look, and also had thin bridges (IIRC). System Shock, which used a more advanced version of the engine was true 3D (and had full vertical look), "force bridges" and wireframe cyberspace flying sections.--Drat (Talk) 07:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was a programmer on Outlaws. Definitely 2.5D - Richfife (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
What about polygonal 3D objects that can freely move and rotate in all dimensions, such as the ship at the end of the first level? That seems equivalent to Descent's capabilities. 66.8.153.181 (talk) 07:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Are you talking about Dark Forces? There was a pre-rendered video sequence at the end of the first level including space ships moving through space. That has nothing to do with the game engine. 2A02:8108:96C0:3948:6964:C6ED:405F:21CE (talk) 12:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes I'm talking about Dark Forces, and I'm referring to in-game realtime rendered. Just at the end of the first level, your ship flies out of the sky as you're fighting the last of the stormtroopers on a rooftop, then hovers overhead waiting for you to end the level. The ship moves and rotates freely through a preprogrammed path, it's composed of textured polygons tilted in all dimensions, and can be observed from any angle.
Similar effects are used throughout Dark Forces for a variety of objects, and they appear technologically distinct from, e.g., mobile objects in Build Engine games, such as the forklift in Shadow Warrior, which I'm aware are composed of level geometry (sectors,) that restrict their use of rotation in more than one dimension, unlike polygonal objects in Dark Forces. 2600:1700:DA90:2AB0:DD01:7756:8B1D:A60C (talk) 09:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

The image File:DF Gromas.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

The Internet Archive isn't a permanent archive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.86.185 (talk) 07:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jedi (game engine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply