Jane Irwin Harrison has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 5, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Burial
editWhere is she buried? I think if we found this out it would be a great addition to the article. --Coingeek (talk) 19:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jane Irwin Harrison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314224047/https://www.dot7.state.pa.us/ce_imagery/phmc_scans/H000895_01H.pdf to https://www.dot7.state.pa.us/ce_imagery/phmc_scans/H000895_01H.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jane Irwin Harrison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051218022318/http://www.picturehistory.com/find/p/14323/mcms.html to http://www.picturehistory.com/find/p/14323/mcms.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jane Irwin Harrison/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: RoySmith (talk · contribs) 18:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Prose
edit- The three years in "(née Irwin; July 23, 1804 – 1845–1847)" are confusing. I see this is later explained as uncertainty in the year of death, but maybe "c. 1846" would be a better way to express that?
- "From this marriage, Jane received seven more siblings". I guess that would make them half-siblings?
- "She was widowed upon the death of her husband": That's an odd sentence; is there any other way to be widowed?
- "it was decided that his wife Anna Harrison would not travel". Who decided that? See MOS:WEASEL.
- "Jane Harrison was chosen" same as above.
- "incoming president" perhaps use the more common term, "president-elect"?
- "Also accompanying them", drop "also"
- "Harrison had asked her aunt" there's multiple Harrisons being discussed. I think you'd do better to refer to her by her first name.
- "as she had previously lived" it's not clear if "she" is referring to Jane Findlay or Jane Harrison, or maybe even Anna Harrison.
- "Harrison married widower Lewis Whiteman, and she died of tuberculosis a few years later." This makes it sound as if there was some causal relationship between the marriage and the tuberculosis.
- I will admit to some general concern over the length of this article, i.e. how short it is. There's nothing in WP:GACR which requires a minimum length (and thus I won't demand additional material), but it stil leaves me wondering if there's more than can or should be said.
Sources
edit- Looking over the references, they all appear to be WP:RS
- The citation for Ref 5 contains an error: "CS1 maint: date and year (link)"
- Spot checking Special:Permalink/1193045011:
- Ref 1: I'm not convinced "She has sometimes been confused with her aunt, Jane Findlay," is supported by this source.
- Ref 3: The source verifies, but the citation is confusing. Why not skip the links to the Cultural Resources Geographic Information System and just cite the NRHP Inventory form directly?
- Ref 9: TIL the word "chatelaine" :-)
Other criteria
edit- I didn't find any copyright problems, either from the spot-checked sources or via earwig.
- Both images have appropriate licenses
- No WP:OR
- No problems with stability, neutrality, etc
Finished with initial review. RoySmith (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- RoySmith I believe I've addressed everything in the article. I reworded all of the items you listed under prose, and I adjusted the sources as needed. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good, thanks for the quick response. RoySmith (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)