Talk:Itsukushima Shrine

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shoread0.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Name of island

"is a Shinto shrine on Itsukushima Island"

Isn't the island actually called Miyajima????

Yes, it is often called Miyajima. But the actual name of the island is Itsukushima. More information is in the article on the island itself. I've put in a link so that interested people will be able to find it more easily. Thanks for pointing out the need for additional explanation. Fg2 00:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I added "popularly known as Miyajima" to the article, because I was also somewhat confused when looking after the name of the island. --Cyfal (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The man made nature of the bay

Recently it was discovered that the bay may have been artificially made. This might affect the Heritage listing. I only have a TV segment to on on this one. Anybody have anything on this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Signature103 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC).

Itsukushima and the atomic bombing of Hiroshima

I was curious about how the Bomb's little visit to Hiroshima affected the shrine. I couldn't find much in the way of reports about this event. I went to Google Earth, and concluded after careful inspection that the shrine would have been shaded by part of Miyajima/Itsukushima (the island) from the blast, and that what might have been seen was a glow reflecting off the hills across the bay from the shrine, but I'm not sure if the blast was below the horizon or not. Since there was no mention of rebuilding the shrine in the record (indeed, the shrine, from the little I did find on the subject matter, apparently served as a refuge for hibakusha about a month after the bombing), that there was little or no damage to the shrine itself from the weapon. But I'm curious as to why nobody seems to mention this shrine closer to the time of the bombing, given Itsukushima's proximity to Hiroshima. 68.36.214.143 (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Update. Even if it had faced the blast, there would've been little or no damage. The damage area didn't even leave the delta itself (the one Hiroshima sat on), while Itsukushima is further away. But, all the same, wouldn't there have been a boom or something like that? 68.36.214.143 (talk) 01:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Bank of Japan building, Hiroshima, photographed in 2005

The Bank of Japan building in Hiroshima is located 500 m from ground zero. It reopened for business a couple of days after the bombing and is still standing (although the bank no longer occupies the building). Itsukushima Shrine is much, much more distant; it should have been safe from the blast. I don't know how far away the sound was heard. Intriguing question! If you find the answer, we'll be interested to know. Fg2 (talk) 02:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Reopening after typhoon damage

When did the shrine reopen after Typhoon Songda in 2005? I imagine it is reopened by now, but the article does not seem 100% clear on that matter. LordAmeth (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Image was accidentally removed

I wanted to save the image, but the buttons on my laptop did not work properly, and the image was removed by accident. How do I revert the edit? 64.53.146.12 (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Never mind, up.wiki.x.io was accidentally added in my "Blocked Images" list. There is no reverting needed. 64.53.146.12 (talk) 03:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Signifcance of the toriii

A previous editor had made the claim that the two auxiliary posts (on each leg of the torii) were placed there for practical reasons, viz., to give the torii more strength against the force of the ocean tide. While I can imagine that the posts might have that effect, I have never seen the claim made in Japanese that that was their purpose. The torii style is a ryobu torii, and there are plenty of that style in land-bound situations where no special external forces are at play. It's virtually impossible to imagine that the shrine made a connection with Shingon Buddhism specifically because it would allow the shrine to use a ryobu torii. SFAIK, the style is meant to symbolize the "dual" nature of truth as displayed by the Shingon ryobu mandala. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hokuto (talk • contribs) 12:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Categorization

Category:12th-century religious buildings is a container cat, but I'm not sure which subcat is appropriate for this. --Slivicon (talk) 20:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Maybe make a new category - Category:Religious buildings completed in 1168. Some of the others have only one page in them, too. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 05:22, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Itsukushima Shrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130517061440/http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/images/uploads/EOS070712Ab.pdf to http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/images/uploads/EOS070712Ab.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080309203119/http://jpimg.digital.archives.go.jp/kouseisai/category/emaki/itsukushima_e.html to http://jpimg.digital.archives.go.jp/kouseisai/category/emaki/itsukushima_e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Torii "gate"

In several instances in the article body and image captions, the torii is referred to as a "torii gate". Is this not redundant? - Bri (talk) 17:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Literature

I'd suggest adding a section on the importance of Itsukushima Shrine on Japanese classical literature. The text mentions Kiyomori's dream. Well, this whole story is depicted in minute detail in what is deemed to be one of Japan's most celebrated works, namely, the Heike Monogatari. Not only the dream, but the Taira clan's numerous visit to the shrine are described. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.165.17.34 (talk) 01:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Redundant?

The first two paragraphs introducing the topic seems to be redundant. In the first paragraph it says "The shrine complex is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and the Japanese government has designated several buildings and possessions as National Treasures.” However in the second paragraph it is said again: "The complex is also listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and six of its buildings and possessions have been designated by the Japanese government as National Treasures.” I feel like the first sentence should be deleted or shortened to avoid repetition. S22mizuki (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

"floating on the water"

Who came up with this bullshit? It's just standing in the water. And it just looks like it's just standing in the water. If anything, it's the rest of the buildings surrounding it, which much more seem to float on the water surface. And it's been looking like that forever. This is the first time I read something about "floating". Unworthy of an encyclopedic article. Is this a viewpoint that the local Japanese tourism bureau is actually using? (In which case I guess it's more or less warranted to include it in the article...), Or is it an invention of western journalists? (In which case it needs to go, badly!) --BjKa (talk) 08:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)