Talk:ItsJustSomeRandomGuy

peacock

I've edited the language in the history section, hopefully eliminating any subjective or promotional tone. At this point, can the peacock tag be removed? thank you. Spideymouse (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Links for major and minor characters need to be cleaned up by someone who knows how to do that. 92.237.209.218 (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

ItsJustSomeRandomGuy Peer review

ItsJustSomeRandomGuy

...has been nominated for a peer review. The page is here. Not a lot of people no of it's existance, though, for some reason. I'd like for anyone who has the time to check out the article as I have made a lot of contributions (here though, not in the actual article). I added all my contributions to the article after I finished in the sandbox. Thank you, Feedback ^☎ 21:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Too much detail

Is it just me, or does this article seem overly involved with petty detail? It seems like something that belongs in a fansite, not an encyclopedia. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Biased

I think its a good idea that DC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.9.237.64 (talk) 05:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

seeking consensus for a split

this page is over 60 kb long and there has been talk that this entry is too detailed. i'm seeking to split the episode guide to a new page, so that this page stays out of trouble. Spideymouse (talk) 17:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I wrote the whole page in User:Feedback/Sandbox with the eventual knowledge that this page would be split. I totally agree with you, but we first must seek the consensus of the split, and then decide which portion of the article would be split to the new article (ItsJustSomeRandomGuy videography, ItsJustSomeRandomGuy reception and popularity, etc.). Let's gove a week for comments. Feedback ^☎ 23:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Removal of links

The links to the videos referenced with this note:

(Removes heavily promotional external links. Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform for Agrusso)

I disagree with this statement. Everything that describes something external to Wikipedia "promotes" it in some way or another. It seems foolish not to offer a link to a media clip that is being described in the text. Indeed, it seems to me that it should be practically mandatory for an online encyclopedia. The fact that it might be promotional for the creator is really irrelevant.98.204.88.129 (talk) 23:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Video Publication Dates

I think the video publication dates on this article's list of videos are fairly inaccurate, especially since YouTube didn't exist in 2002!

Can I trust someone here at Wikipedia to do some research to find the actual publication dates of the videos?

Thanks!

Kind regards, ~Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.220.20.30 (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on ItsJustSomeRandomGuy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090131183209/http://www.nycomiccon.com:80/app/homepage.cfm?appname=100453 to http://www.nycomiccon.com/app/homepage.cfm?appname=100453&moduleID=2525&LinkID=31514&campaignid=61424905&iUserCampaignID=46946452
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090208101251/http://www.nycomiccon.com:80/App/homepage.cfm?moduleid=2577 to http://www.nycomiccon.com/App/homepage.cfm?moduleid=2577&appname=100453

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on ItsJustSomeRandomGuy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080814214345/http://www.nycomiccon.com:80/App/homepage.cfm?moduleid=2577&appname=100453 to http://www.nycomiccon.com/App/homepage.cfm?moduleid=2577&appname=100453
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100531042435/http://www.foro-embarazada.com:80/video/video-poster/itsjustsomerandomguy.html to http://www.foro-embarazada.com/video/video-poster/itsjustsomerandomguy.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion or severe reduction of page needed

The detail on this rather obscure YouTube creator is absurd to say the least. It also seems as if it is written by the subject themselves, and is full of opinionated language, tangents, and needlessly exhaustive lists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lumiras (talk • contribs) 21:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

tweet

he tweeted in 2022 about a possible return. nothing yet however. Masohpotato (talk) 23:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)