Talk:Human Bomb

Wikipedia redirect

The phrase "Human Bomb" redirects to "Suicide Attack". Can this article be renamed "Human Bomb (comics)"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.210.161.70 (talk) 11:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Green Lantern Crossover

In the recent Sinestro Corps War storyline in Green Lantern and Green Lantern Corps., while the DC heroes are attacking Superboy-Prime, Damage can be seen shouting "Human Bomb, on three..." and then the two attack SBP with their similar powers. Perhaps this is worth mentioning in the article? --CopperAlloy (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Enginehead Miniseries

If I remember correctly, Human Bomb was also central to the Enginehead mini-series, which is also out-of-continuity. Maybe someone who has the issues can sum it up? DoctorWorm7 06:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

One Year Later

I realize that my addition is speculation, but DC is usually obtuse with their clues of new characters, though time will tell if Franklin actually takes the name "Human Bomb" or not. Coyote42 09:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Images

According to Project guidelines it's the most recent version of a character that appears in the Infobox. --69.136.111.100 20:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Um... no. The guideline is here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Style guidance#Superhero box images

Nowhere in it is the phrase "most recent version" or words to that effect.

It does propose using "the most universally recognisable appearance of a character" though. That would be the white suit, not the black.

If you have another citation of the guideline, please include it here and in the edit summary.

— J Greb 20:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Humanbombdcu1.jpg

Image:Humanbombdcu1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Human Bomb/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==July 4 through 14== See Talk:Black Condor/Comments#July 4 through 14 for my comments about the "'X'+ years" thing. The same applies here. - J Greb 07:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 07:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human Bomb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701121313/http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=111900 to http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=111900

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)